The Misogyny of the Sky

Misogyny does not begin with hatred.
It begins with a subtraction.

To understand where it is born, we must perform an uncomfortable gesture: we must step back. Not a few centuries. Millennia. Before morals. Before laws. Before monotheisms.

There was a time when the world was not the result of a solitary will. It was not an order pronounced from above. It was an encounter.

For the ancients, creation was not command. It was union.

Sky and earth were not poetic images invented to embellish a story. They were sexed realities. The sky was masculine. The earth was feminine. Not out of symbolic whim, but out of an evident resemblance to the body.

A farmer did not theorize. He watched. He saw the earth open beneath the plow like a body unfolding. He saw the seed deposited. He saw the rain fall from above and penetrate the soil. Then he waited. And after the waiting, the earth swelled and gave birth.

Nature did not suggest metaphors. It displayed a gesture.

The sky fertilized.
The earth received.
The cosmos was born from an act shaped like a body.

This was not arbitrary symbolism. It was concrete experience transformed into myth.

In Mesopotamia this intuition took precise form. The sky was An, father. The earth was Ki, mother. Not a vague metaphor, but a cosmic genealogy. The masculine fertilizes. The feminine generates. The world is born from their tension, their separation, their complementarity. Without the sky there is no fertilization. Without the earth there is no gestation. Cosmic generation is a sexed act.

In archaic Greece, the structure does not change. Gaia is primordial earth, original womb. Uranus is the starry sky that covers and fertilizes her. The cosmos does not arise from law. Not from decree. But from penetration and gestation.

The sexualization of nature is not a late invention. It is the matrix of religious thought.

If the cosmos is born from a sexed union, the feminine is not secondary. It is necessary. It is co-originating.

And this is reflected in settled agricultural civilizations.

Pharaonic Egypt did not know an isolated single god. The sun crossed the sky, but Isis was mother and vital force. Nut arched over the world. Hathor embodied fertility and love. The divine was plural. The cosmos was not monolithic.

And this did not remain confined to myth. Egyptian women could own property, sign contracts, inherit, request divorce. They were not secluded by theological principle. They were not ontologically impure. They did not embody an original guilt. This was not modern equality, but neither was it demonization of the female body. The feminine retained reflection in the divine and, consequently, space within the law.

In a world where creation is conceived as a sexed union, sexuality cannot be shame. It is an echo of the cosmos.

For this reason, in some Mesopotamian cities, sexual union took ritual form. Sacred prostitution — beyond modern debates about its exact configuration — expressed a radical idea: the female body participated in divine fecundity. Union in the temple was not degradation. It was imitation of the cosmic gesture. It repeated on earth what sky and earth performed in myth.

The womb was power.
Sexual union was embodied sacredness.
Desire was not guilt, but generative energy.

As long as the world was born from two, the feminine was necessary.

The rupture begins when the relationship to the earth changes.

Pastoral nomadic cultures are not rooted in cultivated soil. They do not await the grain cycle. They move. They follow herds. They live beneath the open sky. Their survival depends on seasons, rain, direction.

The earth is not a stable womb. It is territory.

In this symbolic world, the sky becomes central. God is not mother. He is father. Shepherd. Guide from above. Lord who dominates from the outside.

Abraham leaves Ur, a great Mesopotamian agricultural and polytheistic city. He abandons the world of sacralized earth and plural divinities. He becomes nomadic. He forms a covenant with a transcendent God, not tied to soil, not paired with a goddess.

Here the rupture opens.

The God of Abraham has no consort. He does not generate with. He does not unite in order to create. He speaks. And the world is.

Creation is no longer fertilization. It is command.

At first, monotheism is not pure. In ancient Israel traces of Asherah survive, a female figure likely associated with Yahweh in earlier phases. But the religion purifies itself. Altars are destroyed. Female symbols eliminated. The goddess expelled.

The one God admits no companions.

For centuries this God does not even have a stable temple. He accompanies a people through the desert. Only with Solomon will a temple be built in Jerusalem. But for a long time the divinity is not rooted in agricultural soil. Not the spouse of the earth. A God of covenant, not of mother-territory.

Meanwhile, already with Sargon of Akkad — emerging from a Semitic pastoral environment — the political model centralizes. The agricultural city gives way to empire. Power becomes vertical. Divinity concentrates.

With the great Semitic kingdoms, legal structure shifts as well. In the Code of Hammurabi women retain rights, but these become more regulated, more constrained, more controlled than in earlier Mesopotamian phases. Marriage becomes a strictly normed contract. Female sexuality is supervised. Lineage must be certain. It is not yet the cancellation of the feminine, but it is a progressive reduction of its autonomous space.

Symbolic transformation and political transformation begin to converge.

Nomadism is not merely an economic form. It is also a martial organization. Those who live by pastoralism are not bound to a field to defend season after season. They can move. Advance. Conquer.

Agricultural civilization needs peace in order to sow and harvest. War interrupts the earth’s cycle. But nomadic society lives by mobility. Its strength is movement.

The God of the single sky fits perfectly into this structure. He is not tied to a city. Not tied to a specific temple. Not the spouse of a goddess rooted in soil. He is universal. Transcendent. Transportable.

A God who marches with a people.

It is no accident that sky-centered religious models succeeded within warrior societies. The sky dominates from above. The warrior conquers from without. Movement becomes expansion.

The earth-mother model is cyclical. The sky-father model is vertical.

And verticality, in history, has proven more effective for building empires.

In mature monotheism God creates alone. There is no longer cosmic penetration and gestation. No longer sexed union. There is unilateral will.

If the world is born from two, the feminine is indispensable.
If the world is born from one alone, the feminine becomes superfluous.

The earth is no longer a creative mother. It is creation. It is matter shaped.

Here the balance breaks.

In the Greek world the pantheon preserves powerful goddesses, yet the feminine becomes progressively channeled into controllable archetypes. Athena is inviolable virgin. Artemis is virgin and huntress. Hera and Demeter embody wife and mother. Aphrodite represents desire, but also destabilizing force.

Virgin.
Mother.
Seductress.

Roles. Not totality.

Ritual sexuality becomes moralized. The erotic woman is no longer cosmic potency, but ambiguity.

With Christianity the rupture consolidates definitively. God is the single father. There is no goddess. The central female figure is Mary: mother and virgin at once. Motherhood separated from sexual act. The feminine accepted only if purified of the body.

Mary Magdalene becomes a figure to redeem. Female desire is no longer cosmic energy, but temptation. The womb is no longer principle of the cosmos, but biological function.

The process continues in Islam. God is one, transcendent, without consort. There is no divine polarity. Religious law regulates the female body, sexuality, visibility.

War does not generate this transformation. Violence becomes possible because the symbolic order has already changed.

The misogyny of the sky begins when the sky remains alone.

When creation no longer needs the earth, the earth loses sacredness. When the feminine no longer has reflection in the divine, it can be controlled, reduced, subordinated.

As long as the world was born from sky and earth, the feminine was principle.
When the world is born from a single God, the feminine becomes superfluous.

And in the superfluous begins subordination.

​​

​

Note 1 — Hammurabi, Centralization, and the First Symbolic Shift

This analysis does not argue that the Code of Hammurabi “invented” misogyny, nor that pastoral societies automatically produce female subordination. The point is not deterministic. It is directional.

The early Sumerian city-states functioned within a polycentric religious system. Divinity was multiple. Both male and female deities held central roles. Inanna, Nisaba, and other figures occupied positions of symbolic importance. The divine was distributed, not concentrated.

With the rise of the Akkadians and later the Babylonians, two parallel movements become visible:

– political centralization
– theological verticalization

With Marduk, something significant happens. In the Enuma Elish, he defeats Tiamat, a primordial feminine force, and establishes order. This is not yet monotheism. But it marks a symbolic shift: divine authority concentrates, and the masculine becomes the dominant organizing principle.

In the Code of Hammurabi, women do not lose all rights, but the legal structure becomes more rigid. Marriage is more tightly regulated. Female sexuality is more strictly controlled. Lineage must be certain. This is not the cancellation of the feminine. It is the progressive compression of its autonomous space.

This is not a sudden rupture, but a direction. A trajectory that precedes monotheism while anticipating its structural logic.

Note 2 — Greece: The Presence of Goddesses and Archetypal Compression

Greece does not contradict this thesis. It complicates it.

The Greek world remained patriarchal while maintaining a pantheon rich in powerful female figures. But the point is not simply the presence of goddesses. The point is how they are framed.

Compared to Inanna — fluid, erotic, sovereign, warlike, and ambivalent — Greek goddesses appear increasingly typologized:

– Athena is virgin, rational, desexualized.
– Artemis is virgin, autonomous, but separated from male erotic integration.
– Hera is defined through marriage.
– Demeter through motherhood.
– Aphrodite through desire, often portrayed as destabilizing.

The feminine does not disappear. But it becomes categorized.

Virgin.
Mother.
Wife.
Seductress.

Greece preserves cosmic polarity. It does not eliminate the feminine from the divine. But it narrows the ways in which feminine power can manifest.

When Christianity emerges in the Hellenistic world, it inherits both Jewish monotheism and Greek symbolic categories. Mary unites two archetypes: mother and virgin. But without eros. The result is a feminine figure that is powerful yet purified of bodily sexuality.

Greece therefore represents a transitional stage: not elimination, but progressive containment of the feminine.

Note 3 — Nomadism, War, and Symbolic Structure

This analysis does not claim that agricultural societies are peaceful or that nomadic societies are inherently violent. History is more complex.

The distinction proposed here is structural, not quantitative.

Agricultural civilizations are rooted in cultivated land, seasonal cycles, and territorial continuity. When they wage war, it is often in defense or consolidation of land already perceived as their own.

Pastoral nomadic societies live through mobility. They are not tied to a field that must be protected season after season. Movement is part of identity. In this context, war becomes structurally compatible with expansion.

At the same time, a divinity not tied to a specific agricultural territory, not bound to a local fertility cycle, and not symbolically paired with a land-based goddess, is inherently portable. Such a God can accompany a people in motion. It can sustain a non-territorial, universalizing identity.

The issue is not who fought more wars.
The issue is when war becomes a foundational cultural principle and when it remains contingent.

This is a question of symbolic compatibility, not absolute historical law.

Note 4 — Islam and the Continuity of Sky-Centered Monotheism

This analysis is not a moral judgment on contemporary Islamic societies. It is a reflection on theological structure.

Islam, like Judaism and Christianity, affirms a single, transcendent God without consort and without divine polarity. The divine is one. It is not accompanied by a co-originating feminine principle.

Female figures such as Khadija, Fatima, and Maryam are respected. But their authority is relational and moral. There is no feminine hypostasis within the Godhead, no sacred feminine principle operating alongside God.

The point is not that Islam “invented” misogyny. The point is that within a system where the divine is exclusively singular, the feminine has no ontological foundation in the sacred order.

When divine polarity disappears, the feminine is no longer necessary to the structure of the cosmos. And what is not necessary can be regulated, disciplined, and controlled.

The question here is metaphysical, not polemical.

​

​